Aggression inhibiting pheromones:
In mice, Jones and
Nowell (1975)reported that the
coagulating glands are also shown to be the source of an
aggression-inhibiting pheromone. The common source of
these two factors suggests that they may be the same pheromone
exerting different effects under different conditions. The territorial
implications of both the aversive pheromone and the
aggression-inhibiting pheromone are discussed (Jones and Nowell,
1973).
Ovary inhibiting pheromone:
Queen
Retinue Pheromone also acts as a primer pheromone by physiologically inhibiting
the ovary development of worker bees. An essential component of QRP,
9-oxo-(E)-2-decenoic acid, acts as a long-distance sex pheromone (Trhlin and Rajchard,2011).
Puberty
inhibiting pheromone:
The onset of puberty in female
house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) can vary from the age of 4 wk to
8 wk as a function of male acceleratory or female inhibitory urinary
pheromones. In field studies, puberty inhibition has been demonstrated directly
with natural and experimental increases in population density(Rjohn G Vandenbergh, 1987).
Courtship-inhibiting
pheromone:
Gregarious mature males
of the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria) emit a
courtship-inhibiting pheromone continuously to repel rivals. This signal evokes
a strong response from males with recent experience of mature females. However,
if males have been female deprived for some time, they start to ignore the
pheromone and attempt to usurp females that are guarded by males. The
probability and intensity with which males struggle for an occupied mate was
found to depend on the time previously spent without a female (Karsten Seidelmann, 2006).
Swarming Inhibiting Pheromone:
Footprint
pheromone -The footprint substances are excreted by
workers, drones and queens.
1.Worker foot-print substances areused fororientation to hive entrance, attraction to food
source, survival of isolated workers, acceptance of grafted larvae in queen
cups, drone mating flight (Butler et al.,1969).
(R,E)-(−)-9-Hydroxy-2-enoic acid
(9-HDA) promotes stability of a swarm, or a "calming" influence Footprint pheromone. This pheromone is left by bees
when they walk and is useful in enhancing Nasonov pheromones in searching for
nectar. In the queen, it is an oily secretion of the queen's tarsal glands that is deposited on the comb
as she walks across it. This inhibits queen cell construction (thereby
inhibiting swarming), and its production diminishes as the queen ages.
Juvenile mouse pheromone inhibits sexual behaviour:
A juvenile pheromone produced by young mice before
puberty, termed exocrine-gland secreting peptide 22 (ESP22). ESP22 is secreted
from the lacrimal gland and released into tears of 2- to 3-week-old mice. Upon
detection, ESP22 activates high-affinity sensory neurons in the vomeronasal
organ, and downstream limbic neurons in the medial amygdala. Recombinant ESP22,
painted on mice, exerts a powerful inhibitory effect on adult male mating
behaviour, which is abolished in knockout mice lacking TRPC2, a key signaling
component of the vomeronasal organ (David M. Ferrero et
al.,2013).
Pheromone inhibition of virulence factor :
The extracellular signal of the
quorum-sensing system is a thiolactone-containing peptide pheromone, whose sequence
varies among the different staphylococcal strains. We demonstrate that a
synthetic Staphylococcus epidermidis pheromone is a
competent inhibitor of the Staphylococcus aureus agr
system. Derivatives of the pheromone, in which the N-terminus or the cyclic
bond structure was changed, were synthesized and their biological activity was
determined. The presence of a correct N-terminus and a thiolactone were
absolute prerequisites for an agr-activating effect in S.
epidermidis, whereas inhibition of the S. aureus
agr system was less dependent on the original structure (Michael Otto et al.,1999).
Pheromone Cross-Inhibition:
Cross-inhibition by
quorum-sensing pheromones betweenStaphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus
epidermidis was investigated using all known S.
aureus agr pheromone subgroups. All S. aureus
subgroups were sensitive towards the S. epidermidis pheromone,
with the exception of the recently identified subgroup 4. The subgroup 4
pheromone was also the only S. aureus pheromone able to
inhibit the S. epidermidis agr response (Michael Otto et al.,2001).
Michael Otto, Hartmut Echner,Wolfgang Voelter and Friedrich Götz.2001. Pheromone
Cross-Inhibition betweenStaphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus
epidermidis.
Infect. Immun. 69(3):1957-1960.
Michael Otto, Roderich Süßmuth, Cuong Vuong, Günther Jung, Friedrich Götz. 1999.Inhibition of
virulence factor expression in Staphylococcus aureus by the Staphylococcus
epidermidis agr pheromone and derivatives, FEBS Leetrs, 450(3): 257–262.
Oviposition-inhibiting pheromone:
Ferguson A.W., Ziesmann J., Blight M.M., Williams I.H., Wadhams L.J.,
Clark S.J., Woodcock C.M. and Mudd A.1999: Perceptiom of oviposition deterring
pheromone by cabbage weevil (Ceutorhynchus
assimilis). J. Chem. Ecol.,25: 1655-1670.
Oviposition
deterrent Pheromone:
The braconid wasp (Diachasma alloeum) attacks two species of fruit-parasitic
flies in the genus Rhagoletis. Female wasps lay a single egg into a
second or third instar fly maggot.Following oviposition, female wasps press and
drag their ovipositor across the fruit surface with this putative oviposition-deterring
pheromone (Stelinski et al., 2007).
Prokopy, R., 1981b. Oviposition-deterring pheromone system of
apple maggot flies. In E. R. Mitchell,
ed. Management of insect pests with semiochemicals. New York:
Plenum Press, pp. 477-497.
Stelinski L. L.,, R. Oakleafand C. Rodriguez-Saona.
2007. Oviposition-deterring
pheromone deposited on blueberry fruit by the parasitic wasp.Diachasma
alloeum Behaviour
144: 429-445.
Antibiotic-induced inhibition of
pheromone:
Ingestion of diet containing
streptomycin inhibited the conversion of myrcene, a host plant terpene, to the
male-specific pheromones ipsenol and ipsdienol in Ips paraconfusus.
Synthesis of cis-verbenol, which is not a sex-specific pheromone, from
the host plant terpene (-)-alpha-pinene and other metabolites from these two
terpenes is,as not inhibited by the antibiotic (Byers and Wood,1981).
adenylate cyclase inhibiting pheromone:
Cells of the a mating type, serves to
synchronize the opposite mating type (a cells) at GI as a prelude to fusion of the
two cell types. It was found that, in vitro, A factor inhibited the' membrane-bound
adenylate cyclase Of these cells in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, one
Class (steS) of a cell mutants that grow
normally at either 230 or 340C but that are unable to respond to a factor or to
mate at the higher temperature possessed an adenylate cyclase activity that was
not inhibited by a factor at 340C but was fully sensitive to inhibition at 230C
(Hans Liao and Jeremy Thorner,1980).
Hans Liao and Jeremy Thorner.1980. Yeast mating pheromone
a factor inhibits adenylate cyclase (cyclic AMP/Saccharomyces cerevisiae/plasma membranes/mutants/peptides).Proc. Natl.Acad.Sci.USA
77(4):1898-1902.
Byers,
J.A. and Wood, D.L. 1981. Antibiotic-Induced Inhibition of Pheromone Synthesis
in a Bark Beetle. Science 213:763-764.
References:
Butler, C.G. and D.H. Calam. 1969. Pheromones of the
honeybee—The secretion of the Nassanoff gland of the worker.Journal of Insect Physiology.,15(2):
237-244.
David M. Ferrero, Lisa M. Moeller, Takuya Osakada, Nao Horio, Qian Li, Dheeraj S. Roy, Annika Cichy, Marc Spehr, Kazushige Touhara and
Stephen D. Liberles.2013. A juvenile mouse pheromone
inhibits sexual behaviour through the vomeronasal system, Nature, 502:368–371.
Jones, R.B.
and N.W. Nowell. 1973.The coagulating glands as a source of aversive and aggression-inhibiting pheromone(s) in the male albino mouse. Physiology and Behavior.,11(4):455-462.
Jones,
R.B. and Nowell, N.W.1975. Effects of
clean and soiled sawdust substrates and
of different urine types upon aggressive behavior in male mice. Aggressive Behavior.,1:111-21.
Karsten Seidelmann.2006. The
courtship-inhibiting pheromone is ignored by female-deprived gregarious desert
locust males, Biol Lett. 2(4): 525–527.
Rjohn G. Vandenbergh. 1987.
Regulation of puberty and its consequences on population dynamics of
mice integrative
and comparative biology . 27(3): 891-898.
Trhlin,M
and J.Rajchard.2011. Chemical
communication in the honeybee (Apis
mellifera L.): a review.Veterinarni
Medicina, 56, 2011 (6): 265-273.
No comments:
Post a Comment